About my  blog
    What I enjoy most about publishing Business District is the fact that I get to meet a lot of interesting people whom are active in the local business community. I get to hear about a lot of interesting initiatives that deserve media attention.
    Many people ask me where we get our content from, and the simple answer is that we get it by paying attention when talking to these people. I also get it from interesting speakers that I hear, and I've trained enough people to consistently pitch ideas (but we can always use more!).
    The purpose of my blog is to chronicle the events that happen during the course of building our publication and its community. I will address issues that I believe are pertinent to your business, showcase innovative business models, and help you gain greater exposure through advertising and public relations.
Jason Myers - Publisher's Blog
Sweet Leaf Tea Founder talks to bootstrappers about the role of capital
With the Central Texas Entrepreneur Funding Symposium only a few days away, it was appropriate that I heard Clayton Christopher, CEO of Sweet Leaf Tea speak at the Bootstrap meeting on Monday. He recently raised $18 Million in capital after being in his 10th year of business.

But it didn’t start out that way.


Christopher also spoke last year at our Austin Open4Business Conference, and the story of how he started the company is always inspiring—he talks about buying a few lobster pots for brewing, pillow cases to strain it, filling up bottles with garden hoses, buying an old refrigerated truck and fighting for shelf space with a product that was perishable after only a week or two.


Christopher makes no bones about how the good ol’ days were not the good ol’ days—and most bootstrap entrepreneurs can identify with just how difficult the constraint is (For more on the role of Constraint, see Business District June 2007 issue, article titled Constraint Creates Innovation). Christopher says he would never want to go back to those days, but he also reveals that had he taken funding from the beginning, not only would he not have known what to do with it, he would have burned through it and been done.


In fact, the value proposition for investors did not present itself for Sweet Leaf Tea until after three years of struggling in the Valley of Death. Christopher talks about how he raised $1Million in capital at that time, and where he could have raised more, he wouldn’t have known what to do with it. In fact, his bootstrapping roots continue to keep the company lean and mean, and search for opportunities that the competitors simply don’t have.


Ultimately, Christopher made the trade off to own a small piece of a much larger company rather than own a big piece of a small company. So for him, raising capital was the “right action at the right time,” especially since he attracted some venture capital that came with beverage experience—and according to Christopher, he learned more from them then he ever thought he would. Now, it’s interesting that he knows exactly what to do with the $18Million he’s raised.


Every entrepreneurial system is different, but the role of capital is not. Capital will accelerate and amplify growth but it will not solve the problems you encounter in the valley of death. Capital too early in the process can be detrimental.  In Christopher’s case, they had emerged out of the VOD and were ready to grow the company in ways that they could not accomplish without capital—at least not in the accelerated time frame that they wanted.


Bijoy Goswami discusses the role of capital in the November 2007 issue of Business District in an article titled: Investor funding—much later than you think. If you or your company are seeking funding, our funding symposium will educate not only on how to go about finding investment, but what the options are out there that you may not know about, how to avoid the pitfalls of investment, working with investors, and legal issues.

Comments on Marc Katz's article on championing universal health coverage
    In the March 2008 issue of Business District, Marc Katz calls for US Businesses to champion universal health coverage.
    Since I tend to fall to the right politically, I cringe at calling for universal anything that is government controlled. But those that are for less government involvement should take the time to understand that Katz is not referring to a single payor system or to government-run healthcare.
    His article makes the point the burden is unfairly placed on businesses in this country, and it shouldn't be.
    Dr. Ken Shine, author of the 2006 Code Red report, explains how we got into this situation in our Dec 2006 issue's executive roundtable. He said, "We got into this situation by accident. After World War II, there were wage and price controls. As a consequence of that, many large companies decided that the way to compete for workers was to offer health benefits. As a result, the U.S. is one of only two countries in the world that connect health care with employment—and that’s the fundamental flaw.
    "We did not take on health insurance as a national requirement. We did move toward the deserving elderly with Medicare, because they were no longer employed. Medicaid was added to it on the grounds that there was a certain amount of other people that also wouldn’t be employed.

    "Any ultimate solution has to involve universal coverage of some kind. Not necessarily a single payor, and not necessarily nationalization.

    "So how do we provide the coverage? There have been a myriad of proposals including everything from expanding Medicare to cover the entire population to expanding things like the federal employees health system to the entire population.

    "
The dilemma with those is that those people vote. They don’t want to see their plan which is working very well threaten to jeopardize by applying it broadly.

    "
Massachusetts is doing it incrementally. What they did was make eligibility for state sponsored health care coverage substantially higher –200-300 percent of the federal poverty level. So they cover large numbers of people, and as a result, their uninsured rate is in the single digits.
    "
So we got into it by accident, and we are only going to get out of it at a point at which some combination of businesses and government leadership decides that there needs to be fundamental switch from employer-based insurance to something that is much broader," Shine concluded.
    Katz's article is exactly along this line by calling for businesses to champion universal health coverage, and I agree.
    This doesn't mean we need to look to the government to solve our healthcare crisis. We need innovative solutions that come from every angle regionally, state-wide, and nationally. Just like the proposed plan from the Hospital district outlined in this issue's "Answering the Call.
    Market forces will drive reform when the pain gets bad enough (just look at what's happening in clean tech and alternative energy with rising gas prices) and Katz is saying we need to band together as businesses and declare our pain.
Categories
Archives
RSS

     
Powered by Levelfield